"Reality
must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled."
—Physicist Richard Feynman in the final report on the Challenger Disaster
Life has had to deal with
environmental change, especially climate change, since the beginning of its
existence on Earth. Species adjust or go extinct, and both have happened. For
life-forms with our kinds of cells—eukaryotic, the kind with distinct organelles—the
average existence of a species is about 1 million years, and, on average, one
species goes extinct a year, at least of the species we have named and know,
including those we know only from fossil records.
Early
man was part of this dance between life and environment. Homo erectus,
the first of our kind who left Africa, would likely have migrated as a matter
of course. They may not have thought of it as migration in our modern sense;
they were going where the environment, including sources of food and water, was
better. Environmental change and moving along with it were only natural.
With the beginning of civilization
and the construction of buildings that could last a long time, and with
investments of time and effort in agricultural fields, as well as the discovery
of specific sources of minerals and the building of mines to get them, people's
lives changed in ways that led to a desire for constancy. Establishment of
property rights and national boundaries (beginning with tribe-established land
boundaries) augmented the need and desire for constancy of place and of
environment. One can argue that it is our species that most needs and most
desires constancy and has therefore formed worldviews that not only require
environmental constancy but have turned it into a fundamental belief, a
folkway, a series of myths.
The more technologically and legally
advanced a civilization, the greater the need and desire for environmental
stability, for a balance of nature. Hence, our modern dilemma vis-à-vis climate
change. Rather than claim the world is constant except for our sinful
interference with it, we need to acknowledge and work out ways to live with
environmental change. This can include doing our best to stop or slow that
change, as we do in the short term with agricultural irrigation, stabilizing
the "precipitation," so to speak. But the harder we work to force
environmental constancy onto our surroundings, the more fragile that constancy
becomes and the greater the effort and energy it takes. The use of groundwater
for crop irrigation illustrates that fragility. Large aquifers that took many
thousands of years to develop are being depleted for crop irrigation over
comparatively short times—decades or centuries.
Excerpt from The Moon in the Nautilus Shell: Discordant Harmonies Reconsidered, by Daniel B. Botkin.
0 comments:
Post a Comment